Spins up five simulated reviewers (editor, three peer reviewers, plus a devil's advocate) who critique your academic paper from distinct angles: methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary perspective, and core argument challenges. The devil's advocate specifically hunts for logical fallacies and cherry-picking, which is honestly the most useful part if you're trying to stress-test before submission. Outputs individual review reports plus a synthesized editorial decision with a prioritized revision roadmap. Supports re-review mode to verify whether your revisions actually addressed the comments, and a calibration mode that reveals the reviewer's own error profile before you trust its rubric scores. Best for pre-submission reality checks or learning what a thorough peer review looks like in your field.
npx skills add https://github.com/imbad0202/academic-research-skills --skill academic-paper-reviewer