Peer Review

If you're writing actual peer reviews for journals or grants, this gives you a structured framework to work through manuscripts systematically. It walks you through initial assessment, section-by-section review (abstract through references), then digs into methodological rigor and statistical validity. The checklist approach helps you catch common issues like inappropriate statistical tests, missing controls, or overstated conclusions. It also covers reporting standards compliance for CONSORT, STROBE, and similar guidelines. The systematic workflow is honestly helpful for keeping reviews thorough and consistent, especially when you're reviewing outside your immediate subfield and need prompts on what to scrutinize.

Install to Claude Code

npx -y skills add k-dense-ai/scientific-agent-skills --skill peer-review --agent claude-code