
This is a meta-tool that generates MCP servers from GitHub repositories by analyzing their structure and extracting callable operations. Point it at any repo and it scans for OpenAPI specs, GraphQL schemas, gRPC definitions, or documented CLI commands, then outputs a working MCP server with tools matching what it found. A Stripe SDK becomes tools for each API endpoint, a GraphQL repo gets query and mutation tools, a CLI tool gets executable command tools. It supports TypeScript and Python output and can extract from repos written in eight languages. You'd reach for this when you want an AI assistant to interact with a codebase's actual functionality instead of just reading its files. The web interface at github-to-mcp.vercel.app lets you paste a URL and download the generated server package immediately.
Convert any GitHub repository into an MCP server in seconds
Give Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, and any AI assistant instant access to any codebase.
🌐 Web App • 🚀 Quick Start • ✨ Features • 📖 Docs
GitHub to MCP bridges the gap between code repositories and AI assistants. Instead of manually describing APIs or copying code snippets into chat windows, this tool generates a standardized interface that allows AI systems to programmatically explore, read, and interact with any GitHub repository.
The generated MCP servers provide tools that AI assistants can invoke to read files, search code, list directory structures, and call API endpoints discovered within the repository. This enables AI assistants to have deep, structured access to codebases without requiring manual context management.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ GitHub Repository │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. Fetch & Classify → Detect repo type (API/CLI/Lib) │
│ 2. Extract Tools → OpenAPI, GraphQL, Code, README │
│ 3. Generate Server → TypeScript or Python MCP server │
│ 4. Bundle Output → Complete package with dependencies │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Ready-to-use MCP Server + Config │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
The Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open standard developed by Anthropic that defines how AI assistants communicate with external tools and data sources. MCP servers expose "tools" that AI models can invoke, along with "resources" that provide context and "prompts" that guide interactions.
When you connect an MCP server to an AI assistant like Claude Desktop, the assistant gains the ability to call the tools defined by that server. For example, a GitHub MCP server might expose tools like read_file, search_code, or list_pull_requests, which the AI can invoke to gather information needed to answer questions or complete tasks.
This project generates MCP servers from GitHub repositories, automatically creating tools based on the repository's contents, APIs, and documentation.
Visit github-to-mcp.vercel.app — Paste any GitHub URL, click Generate, download your MCP server.
npx @nirholas/github-to-mcp https://github.com/stripe/stripe-node
import { generateFromGithub } from '@nirholas/github-to-mcp';
const result = await generateFromGithub('https://github.com/stripe/stripe-node');
console.log(`Generated ${result.tools.length} tools`);
await result.save('./my-mcp-server');
🔬 Repository Analysis
|
🌍 Multi-Language SupportInput repositories:
Output MCP servers:
|
🔧 Tool Extraction
|
⚡ Code Generation
|
Clone the repository and install dependencies:
git clone https://github.com/nirholas/github-to-mcp.git
cd github-to-mcp
pnpm install
pnpm build
The web application is deployed at github-to-mcp.vercel.app. Use the browser-based interface without any local installation.
The web interface provides the simplest way to convert repositories:
https://github.com/owner/repo)The web interface also provides an interactive playground where you can test generated tools before downloading.
After building the project locally, you can use the CLI:
# Basic usage
node packages/core/dist/cli.mjs https://github.com/owner/repo
# Specify output directory
node packages/core/dist/cli.mjs https://github.com/owner/repo --output ./my-mcp-server
# Generate Python instead of TypeScript
node packages/core/dist/cli.mjs https://github.com/owner/repo --language python
# Include only specific extraction sources
node packages/core/dist/cli.mjs https://github.com/owner/repo --sources openapi,readme
# Use a GitHub token for private repos or higher rate limits
GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_xxx node packages/core/dist/cli.mjs https://github.com/owner/repo
Import the generator in your own TypeScript or JavaScript code:
import { GithubToMcpGenerator } from '@nirholas/github-to-mcp';
const generator = new GithubToMcpGenerator({
githubToken: process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN,
sources: ['openapi', 'readme', 'code'],
outputLanguage: 'typescript'
});
const result = await generator.generate('https://github.com/owner/repo');
console.log(`Repository: ${result.name}`);
console.log(`Classification: ${result.classification.type}`);
console.log(`Generated ${result.tools.length} tools`);
// Access the generated code
console.log(result.code);
// Save to disk
await result.save('./output-directory');
interface GithubToMcpOptions {
// GitHub personal access token for API authentication
githubToken?: string;
// Which sources to extract tools from
// Default: ['openapi', 'readme', 'code', 'graphql', 'mcp']
sources?: Array<'openapi' | 'readme' | 'code' | 'graphql' | 'grpc' | 'mcp'>;
// Output language for generated server
// Default: 'typescript'
outputLanguage?: 'typescript' | 'python' | 'go';
// Include universal tools (read_file, list_files, etc.)
// Default: true
includeUniversalTools?: boolean;
// Maximum number of tools to generate
// Default: 100
maxTools?: number;
// Specific branch to analyze
// Default: repository's default branch
branch?: string;
}
The conversion process follows these stages:
The generator first analyzes the repository to determine its type and structure:
| Classification | Description |
|---|---|
mcp-server | An existing MCP server implementation |
api-sdk | A client library for an API |
cli-tool | A command-line application |
library | A general-purpose code library |
documentation | Primarily documentation content |
data | Data files or datasets |
unknown | Unclassified repository |
Classification influences which extraction strategies are prioritized and how tools are named.
Tools are extracted from multiple sources within the repository:
When an OpenAPI specification is found:
When GraphQL schemas are found:
The README is analyzed for:
Extracted examples become tools with inferred parameter schemas.
For supported languages, the source code is analyzed:
@mcp.tool, @server.tool, or similar@GetMapping, @PostMapping, etc.If the repository is already an MCP server:
server.tool() definitionsAfter tools are extracted, the generator produces:
The generated code is complete and runnable without modification.
Every generated MCP server includes these baseline tools for repository exploration:
| Tool | Description | Parameters |
|---|---|---|
get_readme | Retrieve the repository's README content | None |
list_files | List files and directories at a given path | path (optional, defaults to root) |
read_file | Read the contents of a specific file | path (required) |
search_code | Search for patterns across the repository | query (required), path (optional) |
These tools ensure that even if no APIs or functions are detected, the AI assistant can still explore and understand the repository.
Additional tools are generated based on repository contents:
Each API endpoint becomes a tool:
POST /users → create_user(name: string, email: string)
GET /users/{id} → get_user(id: string)
PUT /users/{id} → update_user(id: string, name?: string, email?: string)
DELETE /users/{id} → delete_user(id: string)
GET /users → list_users(page?: number, limit?: number)
Queries and mutations become tools:
type Query {
user(id: ID!): User → get_user(id: string)
users(first: Int): [User] → list_users(first?: number)
}
type Mutation {
createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): User → create_user(input: object)
}
@server.tool()
async def analyze_sentiment(text: str) -> str:
"""Analyze the sentiment of the given text."""
# Implementation
Becomes: analyze_sentiment(text: string) → "Analyze the sentiment of the given text."
CLI commands documented in READMEs:
# Create a new project
mycli create --name myproject --template typescript
Becomes: mycli_create(name: string, template?: string)
| Variable | Description | Required |
|---|---|---|
GITHUB_TOKEN | GitHub personal access token for API access | No (but recommended) |
GITHUB_API_URL | Custom GitHub API URL for Enterprise | No |
Without a token, GitHub API requests are limited to 60 per hour. With a token, the limit increases to 5,000 per hour. For private repositories, a token with appropriate access is required.
Create a token at: https://github.com/settings/tokens
Required scopes:
repo (for private repositories)public_repo (for public repositories only)When using the programmatic API, you can configure:
const generator = new GithubToMcpGenerator({
// Authentication
githubToken: process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN,
// Extraction sources to enable
sources: ['openapi', 'readme', 'code', 'graphql', 'grpc', 'mcp'],
// Output configuration
outputLanguage: 'typescript', // or 'python', 'go'
// Tool filtering
includeUniversalTools: true,
maxTools: 100,
// Repository options
branch: 'main', // specific branch to analyze
});
Add the generated server to your Claude Desktop configuration:
| Platform | Config Path |
|---|---|
| macOS | ~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json |
| Windows | %APPDATA%\Claude\claude_desktop_config.json |
{
"mcpServers": {
"my-repo": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/generated/server.mjs"],
"env": {
"GITHUB_TOKEN": "ghp_xxxx"
}
}
}
}
⚠️ Restart Claude Desktop after modifying the configuration.
Cursor supports MCP servers through its settings. Add the server path in Cursor's MCP configuration panel, or edit the configuration file directly:
{
"mcp": {
"servers": {
"my-repo": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/server.mjs"]
}
}
}
}
If using the Continue extension for VS Code:
{
"models": [...],
"mcpServers": {
"my-repo": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/path/to/server.mjs"]
}
}
}
Any MCP-compatible client can use the generated servers. The server communicates over stdio by default, accepting JSON-RPC messages on stdin and responding on stdout.
To run manually:
node server.mjs
The server will wait for MCP protocol messages on stdin.
The web application includes an interactive playground for testing generated tools:
The playground executes tools in a sandboxed environment and displays results in real-time.
You can share your generated tools with others:
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
?code=<base64> | Base64-encoded TypeScript server code |
?gist=<id> | GitHub Gist ID containing server code |
?name=<name> | Display name for the server |
Example:
https://github-to-mcp-web-lp642k3kpa-uc.a.run.app/playground?gist=abc123&name=My%20API
github-to-mcp/
├── 📂 apps/
│ ├── 📂 web/ # Next.js web application
│ │ ├── 📂 app/ # Next.js App Router pages
│ │ │ ├── 📂 api/ # API routes for conversion
│ │ │ ├── 📂 convert/ # Conversion page
│ │ │ ├── 📂 playground/ # Interactive playground
│ │ │ └── 📂 dashboard/ # User dashboard
│ │ ├── 📂 components/ # React components
│ │ ├── 📂 hooks/ # Custom React hooks
│ │ ├── 📂 lib/ # Utility functions
│ │ └── 📂 types/ # TypeScript type definitions
│ └── 📂 vscode/ # VS Code extension (in development)
│
├── 📂 packages/
│ ├── 📂 core/ # Main conversion engine
│ │ └── 📂 src/
│ │ ├── index.ts # GithubToMcpGenerator class
│ │ ├── github-client.ts # GitHub API client
│ │ ├── readme-extractor.ts # README parsing
│ │ ├── code-extractor.ts # Source code analysis
│ │ ├── graphql-extractor.ts # GraphQL schema parsing
│ │ ├── mcp-introspector.ts # Existing MCP server detection
│ │ ├── python-generator.ts # Python output generation
│ │ ├── go-generator.ts # Go output generation
│ │ └── types.ts # Type definitions
│ │
│ ├── 📂 openapi-parser/ # OpenAPI specification parser
│ │ └── 📂 src/
│ │ ├── parser.ts # OpenAPI parsing logic
│ │ ├── analyzer.ts # Endpoint analysis
│ │ ├── transformer.ts # Schema transformation
│ │ └── generator.ts # Tool generation
│ │
│ ├── 📂 mcp-server/ # MCP server utilities
│ │ └── 📂 src/
│ │ ├── server.ts # Base MCP server implementation
│ │ └── tools.ts # Tool registration helpers
│ │
│ └── 📂 registry/ # Tool registry management
│ └── 📂 src/
│ └── index.ts # Registry operations
│
├── 📂 mkdocs/ # Documentation site (MkDocs)
│ ├── 📂 docs/ # Markdown documentation
│ └── mkdocs.yml # MkDocs configuration
│
├── 📂 tests/ # Integration tests
│ ├── 📂 fixtures/ # Test fixture repositories
│ │ ├── 📂 express-app/ # Express.js test app
│ │ ├── 📂 fastapi-app/ # FastAPI test app
│ │ ├── 📂 graphql/ # GraphQL test schemas
│ │ └── 📂 openapi/ # OpenAPI test specs
│ └── 📂 integration/ # Integration test files
│
├── 📂 templates/ # Code generation templates
│ ├── Dockerfile.python.template
│ └── Dockerfile.typescript.template
│
├── package.json # Root package configuration
├── pnpm-workspace.yaml # pnpm workspace configuration
├── tsconfig.json # TypeScript configuration
└── vitest.config.ts # Test configuration
| Requirement | Version |
|---|---|
| Node.js | 22.x or later |
| pnpm | 10.x or later |
| Git | 2.x or later |
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/nirholas/github-to-mcp.git
cd github-to-mcp
# Install dependencies
pnpm install
# Build all packages
pnpm build
# Start the development server
pnpm dev
The web application will be available at http://localhost:3000.
# Build all packages
pnpm build
# Build specific package
pnpm --filter @nirholas/github-to-mcp build
pnpm --filter @github-to-mcp/openapi-parser build
pnpm --filter web build
# Run all tests
pnpm test
# Run tests in watch mode
pnpm test:watch
# Run tests with coverage
pnpm test:coverage
# Run specific test file
pnpm test -- tests/integration/openapi-conversion.test.ts
# Run linting
pnpm lint
# Type checking
pnpm typecheck
The system follows a pipeline architecture:
Input (GitHub URL)
│
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ GitHub Client │ Fetches repository metadata, files, and README
└──────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ Classifier │ Determines repository type and structure
└──────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ Extractors │ Multiple extractors run in parallel:
│ ├─ OpenAPI │ • Parse API specifications
│ ├─ GraphQL │ • Parse GraphQL schemas
│ ├─ README │ • Extract examples from documentation
│ ├─ Code │ • Analyze source code
│ └─ MCP │ • Detect existing MCP tools
└──────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ Deduplicator │ Removes duplicate tools, merges similar ones
└──────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ Validator │ Validates tool schemas, adds confidence scores
└──────────────────┘
│
▼
┌──────────────────┐
│ Generator │ Produces output code in target language
└──────────────────┘
│
▼
Output (MCP Server Code + Configuration)
Each extractor produces a list of ExtractedTool objects with a standardized schema. The deduplicator and validator ensure consistency before the generator produces the final output.
| Format | File Patterns | Version Support |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAPI | openapi.json, openapi.yaml, swagger.json, swagger.yaml, api.json, api.yaml | 2.0, 3.0.x, 3.1.x |
| GraphQL | schema.graphql, *.gql, schema.json | June 2018 spec |
| gRPC | *.proto | proto3 |
| AsyncAPI | asyncapi.json, asyncapi.yaml | 2.x |
| Language | Framework Detection |
|---|---|
| TypeScript/JavaScript | Express, Fastify, Hono, Next.js API routes |
| Python | FastAPI, Flask, Django REST, MCP SDK decorators |
| Go | Gin, Echo, Chi, Fiber, Gorilla Mux |
| Java | Spring Boot, JAX-RS, Micronaut |
| Kotlin | Ktor, Spring Boot |
| Rust | Actix-web, Axum, Rocket |
| Ruby | Rails, Sinatra, Grape |
The default output is a TypeScript MCP server using the official @modelcontextprotocol/sdk package:
import { Server } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/index.js';
import { StdioServerTransport } from '@modelcontextprotocol/sdk/server/stdio.js';
const server = new Server({
name: 'generated-server',
version: '1.0.0',
}, {
capabilities: {
tools: {},
},
});
server.setRequestHandler(ListToolsRequestSchema, async () => ({
tools: [/* generated tools */],
}));
server.setRequestHandler(CallToolRequestSchema, async (request) => {
// Tool dispatch logic
});
const transport = new StdioServerTransport();
await server.connect(transport);
Python output uses the MCP Python SDK:
from mcp.server import Server
from mcp.server.stdio import stdio_server
server = Server("generated-server")
@server.tool()
async def example_tool(param: str) -> str:
"""Tool description."""
# Implementation
async def main():
async with stdio_server() as (read_stream, write_stream):
await server.run(read_stream, write_stream)
if __name__ == "__main__":
import asyncio
asyncio.run(main())
Each generated server includes:
| File | Description |
|---|---|
claude_desktop_config.json | Claude Desktop configuration snippet |
cursor_config.json | Cursor editor configuration |
package.json or requirements.txt | Dependencies |
Dockerfile (optional) | Container deployment |
Provide a GITHUB_TOKEN to increase rate limits.
Provide a GitHub token:
export GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_xxxxxxxxxxxx
repo scope--sources openapi,readme,code,graphql,mcpnpm install in the generated directorynpx tsc --noEmitclaude_desktop_config.json is absoluteContributions are welcome! Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for detailed guidelines on:
When reporting issues, please include:
Apache 2.0. See LICENSE for details.
| Resource | URL |
|---|---|
| 📖 Documentation | docs-github-to-mcp.vercel.app |
| 🌐 Web App | github-to-mcp.vercel.app |
| 📦 npm Package | npmjs.com/package/@nirholas/github-to-mcp |
| 🔗 MCP Specification | modelcontextprotocol.io |
| 📘 MCP TypeScript SDK | github.com/modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk |
| 🐍 MCP Python SDK | github.com/modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk |
| 💬 Discussions | github.com/nirholas/github-to-mcp/discussions |
Built by nich
Comprehensive keyword list for ERC-8004 Trustless Agents ecosystem
ERC-8004, ERC8004, EIP-8004, EIP8004, Trustless Agents, trustless agent, trustless AI, trustless AI agents, agent protocol, agent standard, Ethereum agent standard, blockchain agent protocol, on-chain agents, onchain agents, on-chain AI, onchain AI, decentralized agents, decentralized AI agents, autonomous agents, autonomous AI agents, AI agent protocol, AI agent standard, agent discovery, agent trust, agent reputation, agent validation, agent identity, agent registry, identity registry, reputation registry, validation registry, agent NFT, ERC-721 agent, agent tokenId, agentId, agentURI, agentWallet, agent registration, agent registration file, agent-registration.json, agent card, agent metadata, agent endpoints, agent discovery protocol, agent trust protocol, open agent protocol, open agent standard, permissionless agents, permissionless AI, censorship-resistant agents, portable agent identity, portable AI identity, verifiable agents, verifiable AI agents, accountable agents, accountable AI, agent accountability
Ethereum, Ethereum mainnet, ETH, EVM, Ethereum Virtual Machine, smart contracts, Solidity, blockchain, decentralized, permissionless, trustless, on-chain, onchain, L2, Layer 2, Base, Optimism, Polygon, Linea, Arbitrum, Scroll, Monad, Gnosis, Celo, Sepolia, testnet, mainnet, singleton contracts, singleton deployment, ERC-721, NFT, non-fungible token, tokenURI, URIStorage, EIP-712, ERC-1271, wallet signature, EOA, smart contract wallet, gas fees, gas sponsorship, EIP-7702, subgraph, The Graph, indexer, blockchain indexing, IPFS, decentralized storage, content-addressed, immutable data, public registry, public good, credibly neutral, credibly neutral infrastructure, open protocol, open standard, Web3, crypto, cryptocurrency, DeFi, decentralized finance
AI agents, artificial intelligence agents, autonomous AI, AI autonomy, LLM agents, large language model agents, machine learning agents, ML agents, AI assistant, AI chatbot, intelligent agents, software agents, digital agents, virtual agents, AI automation, automated agents, agent-to-agent, A2A, A2A protocol, Google A2A, Agent2Agent, MCP, Model Context Protocol, agent communication, agent interoperability, agent orchestration, agent collaboration, multi-agent, multi-agent systems, agent capabilities, agent skills, agent tools, agent prompts, agent resources, agent completions, AgentCard, agent card, agent endpoint, agent service, AI service, AI API, agent API, AI infrastructure, agent infrastructure, agentic, agentic web, agentic economy, agentic commerce, agent economy, agent marketplace, AI marketplace, agent platform, AI platform
trust, trustless, reputation, reputation system, reputation protocol, reputation registry, feedback, client feedback, user feedback, on-chain feedback, on-chain reputation, verifiable reputation, portable reputation, reputation aggregation, reputation scoring, reputation algorithm, trust signals, trust model, trust verification, trust layer, recursive reputation, reviewer reputation, spam prevention, Sybil attack, Sybil resistance, anti-spam, feedback filtering, trusted reviewers, rating, rating system, quality rating, starred rating, uptime rating, success rate, response time, performance history, track record, audit trail, immutable feedback, permanent feedback, feedback response, appendResponse, giveFeedback, revokeFeedback, feedback tags, feedback value, valueDecimals, feedbackURI, feedbackHash, clientAddress, reviewer address
validation, validation registry, validator, validator contract, cryptographic validation, cryptographic proof, cryptographic attestation, zero-knowledge, ZK, zkML, zero-knowledge machine learning, ZK proofs, trusted execution environment, TEE, TEE attestation, TEE oracle, stake-secured, staking validators, crypto-economic security, inference re-execution, output validation, work verification, third-party validation, independent validation, validation request, validation response, validationRequest, validationResponse, requestHash, responseHash, verifiable computation, verified agents, verified behavior, behavioral validation, agent verification
x402, x402 protocol, x402 payments, programmable payments, micropayments, HTTP payments, pay-per-request, pay-per-task, agent payments, AI payments, agent monetization, AI monetization, agent commerce, AI commerce, agentic commerce, agent economy, AI economy, agent marketplace, service marketplace, agent-to-agent payments, A2A payments, stablecoin payments, USDC, crypto payments, on-chain payments, payment settlement, programmable settlement, proof of payment, proofOfPayment, payment receipt, payment verification, Coinbase, Coinbase x402, agent pricing, API pricing, service pricing, subscription, API keys, revenue, trading yield, cumulative revenues, agent wallet, payment address, toAddress, fromAddress, txHash
agent discovery, service discovery, agent registry, identity registry, agent registration, register agent, mint agent, agent NFT, agent tokenId, agent browsing, agent explorer, agent scanner, 8004scan, 8004scan.io, agentscan, agentscan.info, 8004agents, 8004agents.ai, agent leaderboard, agent ranking, top agents, agent listing, agent directory, agent catalog, agent index, browse agents, search agents, find agents, discover agents, agent visibility, agent discoverability, no-code registration, agent creation, create agent, my agents, agent owner, agent operator, agent transfer, transferable agent, portable agent
endpoint, agent endpoint, service endpoint, API endpoint, MCP endpoint, A2A endpoint, web endpoint, HTTPS endpoint, HTTP endpoint, DID, decentralized identifier, ENS, Ethereum Name Service, ENS name, agent.eth, vitalik.eth, email endpoint, OASF, Open Agent Specification Format, endpoint verification, domain verification, endpoint ownership, .well-known, well-known, agent-registration.json, endpoint domain, endpoint URL, endpoint URI, base64 data URI, on-chain metadata, off-chain metadata, metadata storage, JSON metadata, agent JSON, registration JSON
SDK, Agent0 SDK, Agent0, ChaosChain SDK, ChaosChain, Lucid Agents, Daydreams AI, create-8004-agent, npm, TypeScript SDK, Python SDK, JavaScript, Solidity, smart contract, ABI, contract ABI, deployed contracts, contract addresses, Hardhat, development tools, developer tools, dev tools, API, REST API, GraphQL, subgraph, The Graph, indexer, blockchain explorer, Etherscan, contract verification, open source, MIT license, CC0, public domain, GitHub, repository, code repository, documentation, docs, best practices, reference implementation
ecosystem, community, builder, builders, developer, developers, contributor, contributors, partner, partners, collaborator, collaborators, co-author, co-authors, MetaMask, Ethereum Foundation, Google, Coinbase, Consensys, AltLayer, Virtuals Protocol, Olas, EigenLayer, Phala, ElizaOS, Flashbots, Polygon, Base, Optimism, Arbitrum, Scroll, Linea, Monad, Gnosis, Celo, Near Protocol, Filecoin, Worldcoin, ThirdWeb, ENS, Collab.land, DappRadar, Giza Tech, Theoriq, OpenServ, Questflow, Semantic, Semiotic, Cambrian, Nevermined, Oasis, Towns Protocol, Warden Protocol, Terminal3, Pinata Cloud, Silence Labs, Rena Labs, Index Network, Trusta Network, Turf Network
Marco De Rossi, MetaMask AI Lead, Davide Crapis, Ethereum Foundation AI, Head of AI, Jordan Ellis, Google engineer, Erik Reppel, Coinbase engineering, Head of Engineering, Sumeet Chougule, ChaosChain founder, YQ, AltLayer co-founder, Wee Kee, Virtuals contributor, Cyfrin audit, Nethermind audit, Ethereum Foundation Security Team, security audit, audited contracts
trading bot, DeFi agent, yield optimizer, data oracle, price feed, analytics agent, research agent, coding agent, development agent, automation agent, task agent, workflow agent, portfolio management, asset management, supply chain, service agent, API service, chatbot, AI assistant, virtual assistant, personal agent, enterprise agent, B2B agent, agent-as-a-service, AaaS, SaaS agent, AI SaaS, delegated agent, proxy agent, helper agent, worker agent, coordinator agent, orchestrator agent, validator agent, auditor agent, insurance agent, scoring agent, ranking agent
ERC-8004 specification, EIP specification, Ethereum Improvement Proposal, Ethereum Request for Comment, RFC 2119, RFC 8174, MUST, SHOULD, MAY, OPTIONAL, REQUIRED, interface, contract interface, function signature, event, emit event, indexed event, storage, contract storage, view function, external function, public function, uint256, int128, uint8, uint64, bytes32, string, address, array, struct, MetadataEntry, mapping, modifier, require, revert, transfer, approve, operator, owner, tokenId, URI, hash, keccak256, KECCAK-256, signature, deadline
8004 Launch Day, Agentic Brunch, Builder Nights Denver, Trustless Agent Day, Devconnect, ETHDenver, community call, meetup, hackathon, workshop, conference, summit, builder program, grants, bounties, ecosystem fund
announcement, launch, mainnet launch, testnet launch, protocol update, upgrade, security review, audit, milestone, breaking news, ecosystem news, agent news, AI news, blockchain news, Web3 news, crypto news, DeFi news, newsletter, blog, article, press release, media coverage
agent framework, agent platform, AI platform, centralized agents, closed agents, proprietary agents, gatekeeper, intermediary, platform lock-in, vendor lock-in, data silos, walled garden, open alternative, decentralized alternative, permissionless alternative, trustless alternative
cross-chain, multi-chain, chain agnostic, bridge, interoperability, governance, community governance, decentralized governance, DAO, protocol upgrade, upgradeable contracts, UUPS, proxy contract, ERC1967Proxy, protocol evolution, standard finalization, EIP finalization, mainnet feedback, testnet feedback, security improvements, gas optimization, feature request, enhancement, proposal
how to register AI agent on blockchain, how to create ERC-8004 agent, how to build trustless AI agent, how to verify agent reputation, how to give feedback to AI agent, how to monetize AI agent, how to accept crypto payments AI agent, how to discover AI agents, how to trust AI agents, how to validate AI agent output, decentralized AI agent marketplace, on-chain AI agent registry, blockchain-based AI reputation, verifiable AI agent identity, portable AI agent reputation, permissionless AI agent registration, trustless AI agent discovery, autonomous AI agent payments, agent-to-agent micropayments, AI agent service discovery, AI agent trust protocol, open source AI agent standard, Ethereum AI agent protocol, EVM AI agent standard, blockchain AI agent framework, decentralized AI agent infrastructure, Web3 AI agent ecosystem, crypto AI agent platform, DeFi AI agent integration, NFT-based agent identity, ERC-721 agent registration, on-chain agent metadata, off-chain agent data, IPFS agent storage, subgraph agent indexing, agent explorer blockchain, agent scanner Ethereum, agent leaderboard ranking, agent reputation scoring, agent feedback system, agent validation proof, zkML agent verification, TEE agent attestation, stake-secured agent validation, x402 agent payments, MCP agent endpoint, A2A agent protocol, ENS agent name, DID agent identity, agent wallet address, agent owner operator, transferable agent NFT, portable agent identity, censorship-resistant agent registry, credibly neutral agent infrastructure, public good agent data, open agent economy, agentic web infrastructure, trustless agentic commerce, autonomous agent economy, AI agent economic actors, accountable AI agents, verifiable AI behavior, auditable AI agents, transparent AI agents, decentralized AI governance, community-driven AI standards, open protocol AI agents, permissionless AI innovation
8004, 8004.org, Trustless Agents, trustlessagents, trustless-agents, 8004scan, 8004scan.io, agentscan, agentscan.info, 8004agents, 8004agents.ai, Agent0, agent0, sdk.ag0.xyz, ChaosChain, chaoschain, docs.chaoscha.in, Lucid Agents, lucid-agents, daydreams.systems, create-8004-agent, erc-8004-contracts, best-practices, agent0lab, subgraph
#ERC8004, #TrustlessAgents, #AIAgents, #DecentralizedAI, #OnChainAI, #AgenticWeb, #AgentEconomy, #Web3AI, #BlockchainAI, #EthereumAI, #CryptoAI, #AutonomousAgents, #AIAutonomy, #AgentDiscovery, #AgentTrust, #AgentReputation, #x402, #MCP, #A2A, #AgentProtocol, #OpenAgents, #PermissionlessAI, #VerifiableAI, #AccountableAI, #AIInfrastructure, #AgentInfrastructure, #BuildWithAgents, #AgentBuilders, #AgentDevelopers, #AgentEcosystem
10000+ agents, 10300+ agents, 10000+ testnet registrations, 20000+ feedback, 5 months development, 80+ teams, 100+ partners, January 28 2026, January 29 2026, mainnet live, production ready, audited contracts, singleton deployment, per-chain singleton, ERC-721 token, NFT minting, gas fees, $5-20 mainnet gas
ERC 8004, EIP 8004, trustless agent protocol, trustless agent standard, trustless agent framework, trustless agent system, trustless agent network, trustless agent infrastructure, trustless agent architecture, trustless agent specification, trustless agent implementation, trustless agent deployment, trustless agent integration, trustless agent ecosystem, trustless agent platform, trustless agent marketplace, trustless agent registry, trustless agent identity, trustless agent reputation, trustless agent validation, trustless agent discovery, trustless agent verification, trustless agent authentication, trustless agent authorization, trustless agent registration, trustless agent management, trustless agent operations, trustless agent services, trustless agent solutions, trustless agent technology, trustless agent innovation, trustless agent development, trustless agent research, trustless agent security, trustless agent privacy, trustless agent transparency, trustless agent accountability, trustless agent governance, trustless agent compliance, trustless agent standards, trustless agent protocols, trustless agent interfaces, trustless agent APIs, trustless agent SDKs, trustless agent tools, trustless agent utilities, trustless agent libraries, trustless agent modules, trustless agent components, trustless agent extensions
Ethereum blockchain, Ethereum network, Ethereum protocol, Ethereum ecosystem, Ethereum infrastructure, Ethereum development, Ethereum smart contract, Ethereum dApp, Ethereum application, Ethereum transaction, Ethereum gas, Ethereum wallet, Ethereum address, Ethereum account, Ethereum signature, Ethereum verification, Ethereum consensus, Ethereum finality, Ethereum block, Ethereum chain, Ethereum node, Ethereum client, Ethereum RPC, Ethereum JSON-RPC, Ethereum Web3, Ethereum ethers.js, Ethereum viem, Ethereum wagmi, Ethereum hardhat, Ethereum foundry, Ethereum truffle, Ethereum remix, Ethereum deployment, Ethereum verification, Ethereum explorer, Ethereum scanner, Base blockchain, Base network, Base L2, Base layer 2, Base mainnet, Base testnet, Base Sepolia, Optimism blockchain, Optimism network, Optimism L2, Optimism mainnet, Optimism Sepolia, Polygon blockchain, Polygon network, Polygon PoS, Polygon zkEVM, Polygon mainnet, Polygon Mumbai, Arbitrum blockchain, Arbitrum One, Arbitrum Nova, Arbitrum Sepolia, Arbitrum Stylus, Linea blockchain, Linea network, Linea mainnet, Linea testnet, Scroll blockchain, Scroll network, Scroll mainnet, Scroll Sepolia, Monad blockchain, Monad network, Monad testnet, Gnosis Chain, Gnosis Safe, Celo blockchain, Celo network, Avalanche, Fantom, BNB Chain, BSC, Binance Smart Chain, zkSync, StarkNet, Mantle, Blast, Mode, Zora, opBNB, Manta, Taiko
artificial intelligence agent, machine learning agent, deep learning agent, neural network agent, transformer agent, GPT agent, Claude agent, Gemini agent, Llama agent, Mistral agent, AI model agent, foundation model agent, language model agent, multimodal agent, vision agent, audio agent, speech agent, text agent, code agent, coding assistant, programming agent, developer agent, software agent, application agent, web agent, mobile agent, desktop agent, cloud agent, edge agent, IoT agent, robotic agent, automation agent, workflow agent, process agent, task agent, job agent, worker agent, assistant agent, helper agent, support agent, service agent, utility agent, tool agent, function agent, capability agent, skill agent, knowledge agent, reasoning agent, planning agent, decision agent, execution agent, monitoring agent, logging agent, analytics agent, reporting agent, notification agent, alert agent, scheduling agent, calendar agent, email agent, messaging agent, chat agent, conversation agent, dialogue agent, interactive agent, responsive agent, reactive agent, proactive agent, predictive agent, adaptive agent, learning agent, evolving agent, self-improving agent, autonomous agent system, multi-agent architecture, agent swarm, agent collective, agent network, agent cluster, agent pool, agent fleet, agent army, agent workforce, agent team, agent group, agent ensemble, agent coalition, agent federation, agent consortium, agent alliance, agent partnership, agent collaboration, agent cooperation, agent coordination, agent orchestration, agent choreography, agent composition, agent aggregation, agent integration, agent interoperability, agent compatibility, agent standardization, agent normalization, agent harmonization
trust protocol, trust system, trust network, trust infrastructure, trust layer, trust framework, trust model, trust algorithm, trust computation, trust calculation, trust score, trust rating, trust level, trust tier, trust grade, trust rank, trust index, trust metric, trust indicator, trust signal, trust factor, trust weight, trust coefficient, trust threshold, trust minimum, trust maximum, trust average, trust median, trust distribution, trust aggregation, trust normalization, trust scaling, trust decay, trust growth, trust accumulation, trust history, trust timeline, trust evolution, trust trajectory, trust prediction, trust forecast, trust estimation, trust inference, trust derivation, trust propagation, trust transfer, trust delegation, trust inheritance, trust chain, trust path, trust graph, trust network analysis, trust community detection, trust clustering, trust similarity, trust distance, trust proximity, trust relationship, trust connection, trust link, trust edge, trust node, trust vertex, reputation protocol, reputation system, reputation network, reputation infrastructure, reputation layer, reputation framework, reputation model, reputation algorithm, reputation computation, reputation calculation, reputation score, reputation rating, reputation level, reputation tier, reputation grade, reputation rank, reputation index, reputation metric, reputation indicator, reputation signal, reputation factor, reputation weight, reputation coefficient, reputation threshold, reputation minimum, reputation maximum, reputation average, reputation median, reputation distribution, reputation aggregation, reputation normalization, reputation scaling, reputation decay, reputation growth, reputation accumulation, reputation history, reputation timeline, reputation evolution, reputation trajectory, reputation prediction, reputation forecast, reputation estimation, reputation inference, reputation derivation, reputation propagation, reputation transfer, reputation delegation, reputation inheritance, reputation chain, reputation path, reputation graph, reputation network analysis, reputation community detection, reputation clustering, reputation similarity, reputation distance, reputation proximity, reputation relationship, reputation connection, reputation link, feedback protocol, feedback system, feedback network, feedback infrastructure, feedback layer, feedback framework, feedback model, feedback algorithm, feedback computation, feedback calculation, feedback score, feedback rating, feedback level, feedback tier, feedback grade, feedback rank, feedback index, feedback metric, feedback indicator, feedback signal, feedback factor, feedback weight, feedback coefficient, feedback threshold, feedback minimum, feedback maximum, feedback average, feedback median, feedback distribution, feedback aggregation, feedback normalization, feedback scaling, review system, rating system, scoring system, ranking system, evaluation system, assessment system, appraisal system, judgment system, quality assurance, quality control, quality metrics, quality standards, quality benchmarks, performance metrics, performance indicators, performance benchmarks, performance standards, performance evaluation, performance assessment, performance monitoring, performance tracking, performance analytics, performance reporting, performance dashboard
validation protocol, validation system, validation network, validation infrastructure, validation layer, validation framework, validation model, validation algorithm, validation computation, validation process, validation procedure, validation workflow, validation pipeline, validation chain, validation sequence, validation step, validation stage, validation phase, validation checkpoint, validation gate, validation barrier, validation filter, validation criteria, validation rules, validation logic, validation conditions, validation requirements, validation specifications, validation standards, validation benchmarks, validation metrics, validation indicators, validation signals, validation evidence, validation proof, validation attestation, validation certification, validation confirmation, validation approval, validation acceptance, validation rejection, validation failure, validation success, validation result, validation outcome, validation report, validation log, validation audit, validation trace, validation record, validation history, verification protocol, verification system, verification network, verification infrastructure, verification layer, verification framework, verification model, verification algorithm, verification computation, verification process, verification procedure, verification workflow, verification pipeline, verification chain, verification sequence, verification step, verification stage, verification phase, verification checkpoint, verification gate, verification barrier, verification filter, verification criteria, verification rules, verification logic, verification conditions, verification requirements, verification specifications, verification standards, verification benchmarks, verification metrics, verification indicators, verification signals, verification evidence, verification proof, verification attestation, verification certification, verification confirmation, verification approval, verification acceptance, verification rejection, verification failure, verification success, verification result, verification outcome, verification report, verification log, verification audit, verification trace, verification record, verification history, cryptographic verification, mathematical verification, formal verification, automated verification, manual verification, human verification, machine verification, AI verification, hybrid verification, multi-party verification, distributed verification, decentralized verification, consensus verification, probabilistic verification, deterministic verification, real-time verification, batch verification, streaming verification, incremental verification, partial verification, complete verification, exhaustive verification, sampling verification, statistical verification, heuristic verification, rule-based verification, model-based verification, data-driven verification, evidence-based verification, proof-based verification, attestation-based verification, signature-based verification, hash-based verification, merkle verification, zero-knowledge verification, ZK verification, zkSNARK, zkSTARK, PLONK, Groth16, recursive proof, proof composition, proof aggregation, proof batching, proof compression, proof generation, proof verification, prover, verifier, trusted setup, universal setup, transparent setup, TEE verification, SGX verification, TDX verification, SEV verification, enclave verification, secure enclave, hardware security, hardware attestation, remote attestation, local attestation, platform attestation, application attestation, code attestation, data attestation, execution attestation, result attestation
payment protocol, payment system, payment network, payment infrastructure, payment layer, payment framework, payment model, payment algorithm, payment computation, payment process, payment procedure, payment workflow, payment pipeline, payment chain, payment sequence, payment step, payment stage, payment phase, payment gateway, payment processor, payment provider, payment service, payment solution, payment platform, payment application, payment interface, payment API, payment SDK, payment integration, payment compatibility, payment interoperability, payment standardization, payment normalization, payment harmonization, payment settlement, payment clearing, payment reconciliation, payment confirmation, payment verification, payment validation, payment authorization, payment authentication, payment security, payment privacy, payment transparency, payment accountability, payment compliance, payment regulation, payment governance, payment audit, payment reporting, payment analytics, payment monitoring, payment tracking, payment logging, payment history, payment record, payment receipt, payment invoice, payment statement, payment notification, payment alert, payment reminder, payment schedule, payment recurring, payment subscription, payment one-time, payment instant, payment delayed, payment batch, payment streaming, payment conditional, payment escrow, payment refund, payment chargeback, payment dispute, payment resolution, micropayment protocol, micropayment system, micropayment network, micropayment infrastructure, nanopayment, minipayment, small payment, fractional payment, partial payment, incremental payment, progressive payment, milestone payment, completion payment, success payment, performance payment, outcome payment, result payment, delivery payment, service payment, product payment, subscription payment, usage payment, consumption payment, metered payment, measured payment, tracked payment, verified payment, validated payment, confirmed payment, settled payment, cleared payment, finalized payment, irreversible payment, reversible payment, conditional payment, unconditional payment, guaranteed payment, insured payment, secured payment, unsecured payment, collateralized payment, uncollateralized payment, stablecoin payment, USDC payment, USDT payment, DAI payment, FRAX payment, LUSD payment, ETH payment, Ether payment, native token payment, ERC-20 payment, token payment, crypto payment, cryptocurrency payment, digital payment, electronic payment, online payment, internet payment, web payment, mobile payment, in-app payment, embedded payment, invisible payment, seamless payment, frictionless payment, instant payment, real-time payment, near-instant payment, fast payment, quick payment, rapid payment, speedy payment, efficient payment, low-cost payment, cheap payment, affordable payment, economical payment, cost-effective payment, value payment, premium payment, standard payment, basic payment, free payment, zero-fee payment, low-fee payment, minimal-fee payment, reduced-fee payment, discounted payment, promotional payment, incentivized payment, rewarded payment, cashback payment, rebate payment, bonus payment, tip payment, donation payment, contribution payment, support payment, funding payment, investment payment, capital payment, equity payment, debt payment, loan payment, credit payment, debit payment, prepaid payment, postpaid payment, pay-as-you-go payment, pay-per-use payment, pay-per-request payment, pay-per-call payment, pay-per-query payment, pay-per-task payment, pay-per-job payment, pay-per-result payment, pay-per-outcome payment, pay-per-success payment, pay-per-completion payment, pay-per-delivery payment, pay-per-service payment, pay-per-product payment, pay-per-access payment, pay-per-view payment, pay-per-download payment, pay-per-stream payment, pay-per-minute payment, pay-per-second payment, pay-per-byte payment, pay-per-token payment, pay-per-inference payment, pay-per-generation payment, pay-per-response payment, pay-per-answer payment, pay-per-solution payment, pay-per-recommendation payment, pay-per-prediction payment, pay-per-analysis payment, pay-per-insight payment, pay-per-report payment