Paper Revision

This handles the tedious part of paper revisions after peer review: mapping reviewer comments to sections, prioritizing major versus minor concerns, and tracking what needs to change where. It walks through parsing feedback, planning targeted edits, executing them with marked changes (using blue text highlights), and verifying you've actually addressed everything. The workflow includes hooks for running new experiments or generating figures if reviewers asked for additional results. Useful because it enforces a systematic approach instead of randomly jumping between comments, and it makes you document what changed and why. Keeps the previous version around and cross-references every edit to the original concern, which saves time when writing your response to reviewers.