Rebuttal Writing

Turns peer review comments into structured, evidence-based rebuttals with proper academic formatting. It parses reviewer concerns, categorizes them by severity, then generates responses that cite specific sections, equations, and experimental results from your paper. The workflow enforces good rebuttal practices: acknowledge the point, respond with concrete evidence, and write in past tense ("We have added" not "We will add"). Outputs in standard rebuttal format with reviewer-by-reviewer responses and a summary of changes at the top. Useful after getting reviews back, especially when you're staring at three pages of criticism and need to organize your responses methodically. Saves you from the tedious work of extracting and numbering each concern manually.