This gives Claude a structured rubric for evaluating academic work like research papers, proposals, or thesis chapters. You point it at an artifact and it checks whether claims are backed by citations, reviews methodology and study design, flags limitations, and produces structured feedback you can actually use for revisions. It's built for repeatability, so you're not reinventing your evaluation criteria every time. With over 1,000 installs and solid audit passes, it seems people are using it for consistent peer review workflows. Good fit if you're supervising research, running a journal review process, or just trying to be more systematic about reading papers instead of scribbling vague margin notes.
npx -y skills add affaan-m/ecc --skill scholar-evaluation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Select a file.
juliusbrussee/caveman
mattpocock/skills
obra/superpowers
forrestchang/andrej-karpathy-skills
vercel-labs/skills