You're reviewing a manuscript or grant proposal and need to be systematic about it. This walks you through the full peer review process: initial assessment, section-by-section analysis (methods, stats, figures, discussion), checking reproducibility standards, and verifying reporting guidelines like CONSORT or PRISMA. It's thorough on statistical rigor, covering common pitfalls like multiple testing correction, missing power analyses, and overstated conclusions. The workflow is detailed enough that you could hand it to someone doing their first review. Also integrates with the scientific-schematics skill to generate review flowcharts or evaluation frameworks if you need visuals.
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates --skill peer-review