Claude Marketplaces
SkillsMCP serversMarketplacesDigestTools
Submit

This week in Claude

Every Monday: Claude Code, Agent SDK, MCP, and the Anthropic platform moves worth your time.

Skills by category
Frontend DevelopmentBackend & APIsTesting & QASecurityDevOps & CI/CDGit & Pull RequestsDocumentationCode Review & QualityAI & Agent BuildingSkill Development
MCP servers by category
Sales & MarketingWeb & Browser AutomationDatabasesAI & LLM ToolsCloud & InfrastructureCommunication & MessagingDeveloper ToolsDesign & CreativeDocuments & KnowledgeSearch & Web Crawling
Marketplaces by category
AI Agents & OrchestrationLLM IntegrationDevelopment ToolsFrontend & UIBackend & APIsDatabasesTesting & Code QualityDevOps & CloudSecurity & ComplianceGit & Version Control
Claude Marketplaces

An independent directory of skills, plugins and MCP servers for Claude Code. Not affiliated with Anthropic.

Browse

  • Skills
  • MCP servers
  • Marketplaces
  • Weekly digest
  • Skill index
  • MCP index
  • Marketplace index

Site

  • About
  • Tools
  • Submit
  • Feedback
  • Privacy
  • llms.txt
  • Plugins reference

Maker

  • Snug
  • Agent Caffeine
  • knobs
  • Wax
  • Vectoys
  • mertduzgun.com
Crafted at
Skills/Testing & QA
affaan-m avatar

Swift Protocol Di Testing

affaan-m/everything-claude-code

This teaches protocol-based dependency injection for Swift, the kind you actually need when testing file system operations, network calls, or iCloud sync without hitting real I/O. You define small, focused protocols for each external boundary (file reading, bookmark storage), inject them with default parameters so production code stays clean, and swap in mocks for tests. The pattern works well with actors and Sendable requirements. It's straightforward and avoids the common mistakes like creating giant protocols or mocking everything. If you're writing Swift code that needs deterministic tests for error paths or works across app, test, and preview contexts, this is the standard approach done right.

installs
5K
GitHub stars
229.1K
last updated
Jul 14, 2026
View on GitHubSave

Install

$ npx -y skills add affaan-m/everything-claude-code --skill swift-protocol-di-testing --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files

Swift Protocol-Based Dependency Injection for Testing

Patterns for making Swift code testable by abstracting external dependencies (file system, network, iCloud) behind small, focused protocols. Enables deterministic tests without I/O.

When to Activate

  • Writing Swift code that accesses file system, network, or external APIs
  • Need to test error handling paths without triggering real failures
  • Building modules that work across environments (app, test, SwiftUI preview)
  • Designing testable architecture with Swift concurrency (actors, Sendable)

Core Pattern

1. Define Small, Focused Protocols

Each protocol handles exactly one external concern.

// File system access
public protocol FileSystemProviding: Sendable {
    func containerURL(for purpose: Purpose) -> URL?
}

// File read/write operations
public protocol FileAccessorProviding: Sendable {
    func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data
    func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws
    func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool
}

// Bookmark storage (e.g., for sandboxed apps)
public protocol BookmarkStorageProviding: Sendable {
    func saveBookmark(_ data: Data, for key: String) throws
    func loadBookmark(for key: String) throws -> Data?
}

2. Create Default (Production) Implementations

public struct DefaultFileSystemProvider: FileSystemProviding {
    public init() {}

    public func containerURL(for purpose: Purpose) -> URL? {
        FileManager.default.url(forUbiquityContainerIdentifier: nil)
    }
}

public struct DefaultFileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding {
    public init() {}

    public func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data {
        try Data(contentsOf: url)
    }

    public func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws {
        try data.write(to: url, options: .atomic)
    }

    public func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool {
        FileManager.default.fileExists(atPath: url.path)
    }
}

3. Create Mock Implementations for Testing

public final class MockFileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding, @unchecked Sendable {
    public var files: [URL: Data] = [:]
    public var readError: Error?
    public var writeError: Error?

    public init() {}

    public func read(from url: URL) throws -> Data {
        if let error = readError { throw error }
        guard let data = files[url] else {
            throw CocoaError(.fileReadNoSuchFile)
        }
        return data
    }

    public func write(_ data: Data, to url: URL) throws {
        if let error = writeError { throw error }
        files[url] = data
    }

    public func fileExists(at url: URL) -> Bool {
        files[url] != nil
    }
}

4. Inject Dependencies with Default Parameters

Production code uses defaults; tests inject mocks.

public actor SyncManager {
    private let fileSystem: FileSystemProviding
    private let fileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding

    public init(
        fileSystem: FileSystemProviding = DefaultFileSystemProvider(),
        fileAccessor: FileAccessorProviding = DefaultFileAccessor()
    ) {
        self.fileSystem = fileSystem
        self.fileAccessor = fileAccessor
    }

    public func sync() async throws {
        guard let containerURL = fileSystem.containerURL(for: .sync) else {
            throw SyncError.containerNotAvailable
        }
        let data = try fileAccessor.read(
            from: containerURL.appendingPathComponent("data.json")
        )
        // Process data...
    }
}

5. Write Tests with Swift Testing

import Testing

@Test("Sync manager handles missing container")
func testMissingContainer() async {
    let mockFileSystem = MockFileSystemProvider(containerURL: nil)
    let manager = SyncManager(fileSystem: mockFileSystem)

    await #expect(throws: SyncError.containerNotAvailable) {
        try await manager.sync()
    }
}

@Test("Sync manager reads data correctly")
func testReadData() async throws {
    let mockFileAccessor = MockFileAccessor()
    mockFileAccessor.files[testURL] = testData

    let manager = SyncManager(fileAccessor: mockFileAccessor)
    let result = try await manager.loadData()

    #expect(result == expectedData)
}

@Test("Sync manager handles read errors gracefully")
func testReadError() async {
    let mockFileAccessor = MockFileAccessor()
    mockFileAccessor.readError = CocoaError(.fileReadCorruptFile)

    let manager = SyncManager(fileAccessor: mockFileAccessor)

    await #expect(throws: SyncError.self) {
        try await manager.sync()
    }
}

Best Practices

  • Single Responsibility: Each protocol should handle one concern — don't create "god protocols" with many methods
  • Sendable conformance: Required when protocols are used across actor boundaries
  • Default parameters: Let production code use real implementations by default; only tests need to specify mocks
  • Error simulation: Design mocks with configurable error properties for testing failure paths
  • Only mock boundaries: Mock external dependencies (file system, network, APIs), not internal types

Anti-Patterns to Avoid

  • Creating a single large protocol that covers all external access
  • Mocking internal types that have no external dependencies
  • Using #if DEBUG conditionals instead of proper dependency injection
  • Forgetting Sendable conformance when used with actors
  • Over-engineering: if a type has no external dependencies, it doesn't need a protocol

When to Use

  • Any Swift code that touches file system, network, or external APIs
  • Testing error handling paths that are hard to trigger in real environments
  • Building modules that need to work in app, test, and SwiftUI preview contexts
  • Apps using Swift concurrency (actors, structured concurrency) that need testable architecture
SKILL.md on GitHub

Sponsors

SnugThe clipboard manager you and your agent can use, safelyAgent CaffeineClose your lid, come back to finished workWaxBlock anything with supervision, without erasing your iPhoneOpen StepsSponsoredFree and open-source skills that make AI coding agents easier to understand, verify, and control.

Details

Repository
github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code
Categories
Testing & QA, Mobile Development

More from affaan-m/everything-claude-code

All 256
  • Bun Runtime4.9K
  • Nextjs Turbopack4.9K
  • Plankton Code Quality4.9K
  • Swift Concurrency 6 24.9K
  • Visa Doc Translate4.9K
  • Ai Regression Testing4.8K
  • Architecture Decision Records4.8K
  • Blueprint4.8K
  • Everything Claude Code Conventions4.8K
  • Exa Search4.8K
  • Kotlin Testing4.8K
  • Customs Trade Compliance4.7K
  • Data Scraper Agent4.7K
  • Documentation Lookup4.7K
  • Enterprise Agent Ops4.7K
  • Flutter Dart Code Review4.7K
  • Inventory Demand Planning4.7K
  • Kotlin Ktor Patterns4.7K
  • Nanoclaw Repl4.7K
  • Pytorch Patterns4.7K
  • Ralphinho Rfc Pipeline4.7K
  • Carrier Relationship Management4.6K
  • Context Budget4.6K
  • Crosspost4.6K

Recommended

More Testing & QA
1lijigang avatarljg-qalijigang/ljg-skills信息提问机。给一篇文章/论文/书,把核心观点抽成 Q-A 对——Question 切要害,不教科书;Answer 简洁清晰,有形式化收口,逻辑链完整。读者顺 Q 链走过,每个 A 砸下一枚钉子,复现作者整套推理。Use when user says '问答', 'Q&A', 'QA', '提问', '抽取问题', '/4.8Kinstalls
2affaan-m avatarai-regression-testingaffaan-m/everything-claude-codeai regression testing4.8Kinstalls
3affaan-m avatarkotlin-testingaffaan-m/everything-claude-codekotlin testing4.8Kinstalls
4affaan-m avatarai-regression-testingaffaan-m/eccRegression testing strategies for AI-assisted development. Sandbox-mode API testing without database dependencies, automated bug-check workflows, and patterns t4.7Kinstalls
5affaan-m avatarperl-testingaffaan-m/everything-claude-codeperl testing4.5Kinstalls
6affaan-m avatarbrowser-qaaffaan-m/everything-claude-codebrowser qa4.3Kinstalls