Built for anyone writing Industrial AI literature reviews who's tired of generic research workflows. The four-question intake forces you to define scope before you start searching, then prioritizes sources from arXiv, IEEE, and automation venues instead of dumping everything into the pile. The contrarian synthesis pass is the standout feature: it actively looks for contradictions and gaps instead of just summarizing consensus. You get four output modes including a venue-ranked survey and research-gap memo, plus optional LaTeX export. It's opinionated about structure, which is either exactly what you need or will annoy you depending on how much hand-holding you want.
npx skills add https://github.com/bahayonghang/academic-writing-skills --skill industrial-ai-research