
This walks you through building a proper topic cluster from a seed keyword: pillar page targeting the head term, 8-20 spoke pages covering subtopics, and the bidirectional linking structure Google actually rewards. It scores your existing coverage, helps you prioritize which gaps to fill first, and gives you health metrics (coverage, link health, content quality) so you know when the cluster is actually ready to compete. The output is a production roadmap with an interlinking plan, not just a list of article ideas. Use it when you're trying to rank for a competitive keyword and need the supporting content architecture, not when you just need one blog post.
$ npx -y skills add calm-north/seojuice-skills --skill build-clusters --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Build a topical authority cluster from a seed keyword using pillar-spoke structure, coverage scoring, and interlinking plans.
A topic cluster is a group of interlinked pages that collectively cover a subject area. Google evaluates topical authority at the cluster level — ranking a single page is harder if the site has no supporting content around the topic.
Structure:
Gather this context (ask if not provided):
From the seed topic, generate subtopics using these methods:
Search-derived:
Intent-derived:
Audience-derived:
Aim for 8-20 subtopics per cluster.
Organize subtopics into a structured cluster:
Pillar: [Broad Topic] (head term)
│
├── Spoke: [Subtopic 1] (body term)
│ └── Intent: informational
│
├── Spoke: [Subtopic 2] (body term)
│ └── Intent: commercial investigation
│
├── Spoke: [Subtopic 3] (long-tail)
│ └── Intent: transactional
│
├── Spoke: [Subtopic 4] (long-tail)
│ └── Intent: informational
│
└── ... (8-15 more spokes)
Score how well the existing site covers the cluster:
| Subtopic | Existing Page? | Quality (1-5) | Traffic | Gap? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [subtopic 1] | /blog/topic-1 | 4 | 500/mo | No |
| [subtopic 2] | — | — | — | Yes |
| [subtopic 3] | /blog/old-post | 2 | 50/mo | Partial (needs refresh) |
The pillar page should:
Pillar page is NOT a mega-article that tries to cover everything in depth. It is a hub that distributes authority and directs readers to the right spoke.
Map the internal links:
| From Page | To Page | Anchor Text | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pillar | Spoke 1 | "[subtopic 1] guide" | In the subtopic 1 overview section |
| Spoke 1 | Pillar | "[broad topic]" | In the introduction or conclusion |
| Spoke 1 | Spoke 2 | "[subtopic 2]" | Where subtopic 2 is mentioned contextually |
| Spoke 3 | Spoke 1 | "[subtopic 1]" | Where comparison is relevant |
Rules:
Score the cluster's readiness to compete:
Coverage Score = (Covered spokes / Total spokes) x 100
Link Health = (Spokes with bidirectional pillar link / Total spokes) x 100
Content Quality = (Spokes scoring 3+ quality / Total spokes) x 100
| Metric | Score | Threshold |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | [x]% | > 70% to start ranking for pillar keyword |
| Link Health | [x]% | 100% is the target — every spoke must link to pillar and back |
| Content Quality | [x]% | > 80% — clusters with thin spokes dilute authority |
| Cluster State | Coverage | Link Health | Content Quality | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incomplete | <50% | <70% | Any | Pillar unlikely to rank page 1; spokes rank individually at best |
| Developing | 50-70% | 70-90% | 50-80% | Pillar may appear page 2-3; some spokes rank for long-tail |
| Competitive | 70-90% | 100% | 80-90% | Pillar competes for page 1; most spokes rank for their targets |
| Dominant | >90% | 100% | >90% | Pillar strong on page 1; cluster captures most queries in the topic |
| Link Type | Minimum Count | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Pillar → each spoke | 1 per spoke | Downward — link from the relevant section of the pillar |
| Each spoke → pillar | 1 per spoke | Upward — "our complete [topic] guide" |
| Spoke ↔ sibling spokes | 2-4 per spoke | Lateral — where contextually natural |
| Cross-cluster bridges | 0-2 per cluster | Between hubs — only with genuine topical relevance |
Cluster ready to compete: Coverage > 70%, Link Health = 100%, Content Quality > 80%. Below these thresholds, prioritize filling gaps before expecting the pillar to rank.
Order the content production for maximum impact:
Cluster Summary
Cluster Map [Visual structure from Step 2]
Coverage Scorecard [Table from Step 3]
Pillar Page Spec
Interlinking Plan [Table from Step 5]
Production Roadmap [Ordered list from Step 6 with estimated timelines]
Pro Tip: Use the free Blog Keyword Generator to discover subtopics for your cluster. SEOJuice MCP users get automatic cluster mapping — run
/seojuice:content-strategyto see existing clusters with coverage metrics, or uselist_clustersandget_cluster_detailto check cluster health and identify gaps.
Sponsors