Requesting Code Review

This is a structured approach to catching bugs before they compound by dispatching Claude's code reviewer subagent at key checkpoints. Use it after completing tasks in subagent-driven workflows, before merging to main, or when you're stuck and need fresh eyes. It walks you through getting git SHAs, filling out the review template with what you built versus what was planned, and then triaging feedback into Critical, Important, and Minor buckets. The discipline of reviewing after each task instead of waiting until the end is the real value here. It's opinionated about when reviews are mandatory versus optional, and includes sensible rules like never skipping review because something seems simple or ignoring Critical issues.