Claude Marketplaces
SkillsMCP serversMarketplacesDigestTools
Submit

This week in Claude

Every Monday: Claude Code, Agent SDK, MCP, and the Anthropic platform moves worth your time.

Skills by category
Frontend DevelopmentBackend & APIsTesting & QASecurityDevOps & CI/CDGit & Pull RequestsDocumentationCode Review & QualityAI & Agent BuildingSkill Development
MCP servers by category
Sales & MarketingWeb & Browser AutomationDatabasesAI & LLM ToolsCloud & InfrastructureCommunication & MessagingDeveloper ToolsDesign & CreativeDocuments & KnowledgeSearch & Web Crawling
Marketplaces by category
AI Agents & OrchestrationLLM IntegrationDevelopment ToolsFrontend & UIBackend & APIsDatabasesTesting & Code QualityDevOps & CloudSecurity & ComplianceGit & Version Control
Claude Marketplaces

An independent directory of skills, plugins and MCP servers for Claude Code. Not affiliated with Anthropic.

Browse

  • Skills
  • MCP servers
  • Marketplaces
  • Weekly digest
  • Skill index
  • MCP index
  • Marketplace index

Site

  • About
  • Tools
  • Submit
  • Feedback
  • Privacy
  • llms.txt
  • Plugins reference

Maker

  • Snug
  • Agent Caffeine
  • knobs
  • Wax
  • Vectoys
  • mertduzgun.com
Crafted at
Skills/Code Review & Quality
ganyuanran avatar

Dispatching Parallel Agents

ganyuanran/aegis

When you've got multiple independent failures after a refactor, this is about spinning up separate agents to tackle each problem domain in parallel instead of debugging sequentially. Each agent gets a tightly scoped prompt with specific context, clear constraints, and an instruction to report back what they found. The key insight is recognizing when problems are truly independent (abort tests, batch completion, race conditions) versus related. In the documented example, three agents fixed six test failures concurrently across different files with zero conflicts. The pattern works when there's no shared state and you can clearly partition the work, but it requires discipline in crafting focused prompts and verifying the results don't step on each other.

GitHub stars
492
last updated
Jun 11, 2026
View on GitHubSave

Install

$ npx -y skills add ganyuanran/aegis --skill dispatching-parallel-agents --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files

Dispatching Parallel Agents

Purpose

Use parallel children for two or more ad-hoc, bounded tasks only when their independence is already credible and concurrency is worth the coordination. Parallelism changes elapsed time; it does not relax evidence, ownership, or completion requirements.

Dispatch Gate

Dispatch only when all are true:

  • there are 2+ distinct tasks or evidence questions;
  • one task's result is not needed to define or start another;
  • the tasks do not require overlapping writes or the same mutable resource;
  • a shared root cause is unlikely based on current evidence;
  • each result can be returned with bounded evidence and unresolved unknowns;
  • available concurrency and expected work justify coordination cost.

Keep work inline when decomposition is still exploratory, failures may share a root cause, full-system context is required, or tasks are too small to repay the handoff. A written implementation plan routes to aegis:subagent-driven-development, not this ad-hoc workflow.

Context And Ownership

Choose the live host's context inheritance mode deliberately. Give each child the minimum sufficient instructions and evidence; do not rely on accidental inheritance or assume that context must never be inherited.

Each task packet states:

  • goal and question to resolve;
  • allowed files, systems, and side effects;
  • known facts and evidence locations;
  • constraints, non-goals, and stop condition;
  • expected result shape, including unknowns and verification refs.

Isolated model context does not imply an isolated filesystem, process, Git repository, credential, rate limit, or external service. Prefer read-only investigation. If children may edit, assign disjoint write ownership explicitly. The coordinator owns staging, commits, branches, worktrees, integration, and other Git lifecycle mutations.

Execution

  1. Establish the minimum common baseline and record evidence for the task split.
  2. Dispatch one bounded task per independent domain, within host concurrency limits.
  3. Optionally continue coordinator work that does not race child reads or writes.
  4. On return, check evidence freshness, unknowns, overlapping assumptions, and visible workspace changes.
  5. Synthesize disagreements before acting. If results reveal coupling, stop parallel mutation and return the work to one owner.
  6. For edits, run integrated verification after accepted changes are combined. For read-only work, validate the synthesis against the cited sources.

The coordinator owns the concurrency budget. Children do not delegate recursively unless their packet explicitly permits it. A failed, cancelled, or timed-out child contributes any available partial evidence; otherwise record no result and the unresolved unknowns. Retry only with a materially different packet or serialize the task.

Child output is evidence or a proposal, not a GateDecision, completion authority, or permission for external action.

Common Failure Modes

  • Separate files are treated as proof of separate root causes.
  • Children receive broad conversation history instead of bounded task context.
  • Multiple children edit the same owner or mutate shared services concurrently.
  • A child report is accepted without inspecting evidence or current files.
  • Parallel work is used for a written plan and bypasses its review checkpoints.
  • The coordinator verifies each result alone but never checks the integrated state.

When any of these appears, narrow the packets, serialize the shared portion, or return to the owning debugging or plan workflow.

SKILL.md on GitHub

Sponsors

SnugThe clipboard manager you and your agent can use, safelyAgent CaffeineClose your lid, come back to finished workWaxBlock anything with supervision, without erasing your iPhoneOpen StepsSponsoredFree and open-source skills that make AI coding agents easier to understand, verify, and control.

Details

Repository
github.com/ganyuanran/aegis
Categories
Code Review & Quality, Automation & Workflows
License
MIT
First seen
Jun 11, 2026

More from ganyuanran/aegis

All 22
  • Establishing Project Context
  • Executing Plans
  • Finishing A Development Branch
  • First Principles Review
  • Goal Framing
  • Long Task Continuation
  • Receiving Code Review
  • Recording Architecture Decisions
  • Requesting Code Review
  • Subagent Driven Development
  • Systematic Debugging
  • Test Driven Development
  • Update Aegis
  • Using Aegis
  • Using Git Worktrees
  • Verification Before Completion
  • Writing Plans
  • Writing Skills
  • Anti Entropy Governance
  • Brainstorming
  • Communicating Concisely

Recommended

More Code Review & Quality
1ganyuanran avatartest-driven-developmentganyuanran/aegisEnforces classic red-green-refactor discipline: write a failing test, watch it fail, write minimal code to pass, then clean up.0installs
2geekjourneyx avatarai-daily-newsgeekjourneyx/ai-daily-skillFetches AI news from smol.ai RSS and generates structured markdown with intelligent summarization and categorization. Optionally creates beautiful HTML webpages0installs
3github avataraws-cloudwatch-investigationgithub/awesome-copilotReusable investigation patterns for AWS CloudWatch: Logs Insights query templates, alarm-to-deployment correlation, blast-radius narrowing decision tree, and Pr0installs
4github avatarincident-postmortemgithub/awesome-copilotUse when an outage, production incident, or significant service degradation has occurred and the team needs to write a structured blameless post-mortem. Trigger0installs
5hoangnguyen0403 avatardesign-solutionhoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standardTurn an approved PRD or implementation goal into SRS/FRS technical requirements (How), architecture, contracts, and verification decisions.0installs
6hoangnguyen0403 avatarskill-benchmarkhoangnguyen0403/agent-skills-standardBenchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.0installs