This runs through a page and scores it on Google's four quality rater signals: Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness. It's not looking for whether you have an author bio (table stakes), but whether the content actually feels like it was written by someone who's done the thing. The output is a scorecard plus specific fixes ranked by effort, like "add a first-person observation in the first 500 words" or "cite the primary source for that 42% claim." It includes stricter scoring for YMYL pages and bundled references for schema templates and content-type rubrics. Honest take: most E-E-A-T advice is vague. This gives you a punch list.
npx -y skills add inhouseseo/superseo-skills --skill eeat-audit --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Select a file.
sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills
moizibnyousaf/ai-agent-skills
github/awesome-copilot