Claude Marketplaces
SkillsMCP serversMarketplacesDigestTools
Submit

This week in Claude

Every Monday: Claude Code, Agent SDK, MCP, and the Anthropic platform moves worth your time.

Skills by category
Frontend DevelopmentBackend & APIsTesting & QASecurityDevOps & CI/CDGit & Pull RequestsDocumentationCode Review & QualityAI & Agent BuildingSkill Development
MCP servers by category
Sales & MarketingWeb & Browser AutomationDatabasesAI & LLM ToolsCloud & InfrastructureCommunication & MessagingDeveloper ToolsDesign & CreativeDocuments & KnowledgeSearch & Web Crawling
Marketplaces by category
AI Agents & OrchestrationLLM IntegrationDevelopment ToolsFrontend & UIBackend & APIsDatabasesTesting & Code QualityDevOps & CloudSecurity & ComplianceGit & Version Control
Claude Marketplaces

An independent directory of skills, plugins and MCP servers for Claude Code. Not affiliated with Anthropic.

Browse

  • Skills
  • MCP servers
  • Marketplaces
  • Weekly digest
  • Skill index
  • MCP index
  • Marketplace index

Site

  • About
  • Tools
  • Submit
  • Feedback
  • Privacy
  • llms.txt
  • Plugins reference

Maker

  • Snug
  • Agent Caffeine
  • knobs
  • Wax
  • Vectoys
  • mertduzgun.com
Crafted at
Skills/Git & Pull Requests
obra avatar

Finishing A Development Branch

obra/superpowers

When you finish implementing a feature branch, this handles the "now what?" moment by running your test suite first, then presenting exactly four options: merge locally, create a PR, keep the branch, or discard it. It won't let you proceed if tests are failing and requires typed confirmation before deleting work. The structure eliminates the back-and-forth of "should I merge or PR?" and handles git worktree cleanup automatically. Honestly, it's the kind of systematic approach that prevents you from leaving half-finished branches scattered around your repo or accidentally merging broken code.

installs
216.4K
GitHub stars
305.7K
last updated
Aug 21, 2026
View on GitHubSave

Install

$ npx -y skills add obra/superpowers --skill finishing-a-development-branch --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Files

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

Step 1: Verify Tests

Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).

If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

If tests pass: continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Detect Environment

GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)

This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:

StateMenuCleanup
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo)Standard 3 optionsNo worktree to clean up
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branchStandard 3 optionsProvenance-based (see Step 6)
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEADReduced 2 options (no merge)Externally managed — leave in place

Step 3: Determine Base Branch

The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.

Step 4: Present Options

Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)

Which option?

Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:

Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).

1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)

Which option?

Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.

Step 5: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.

Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:

git branch -d <feature-branch>

Option 2: Push and Create PR

git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote:
# git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch>

Then create the pull/merge request against with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.

Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."

If your human partner asks to discard the work

This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:

MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:

git branch -D <feature-branch>

Step 6: Cleanup Workspace

Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree — and use the GIT_DIR/GIT_COMMON/WORKTREE_PATH values captured in Step 2, from before that directory change.

If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.

If WORKTREE_PATH is under .worktrees/ or worktrees/: Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup:

git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune  # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations

If removal is refused (contains modified or untracked files): the worktree holds files that exist nowhere else — uncommitted plans, notes, or scratch work. Never --force on your own initiative. Show your human partner what is at stake and ask:

git -C "$WORKTREE_PATH" status --porcelain -uall
Worktree removal refused — these files were never committed:

<file list>

1. Commit them to <branch> before cleanup
2. Move them into <main repo root>
3. Delete them (unrecoverable)

Which?

Carry out the choice, then remove the worktree.

Otherwise: The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locallyyes--yes
2. Create PR-yesyes-
3. Keep as-is--yes-
Discard (explicit request only)---yes (force)

Common Rationalizations

ExcuseReality
"Tests passed earlier this session"Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on.
"They obviously want it merged"Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait.
"They seem done with this feature — I'll offer to discard it"The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words.
"'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation"Only the typed word discard authorizes deletion.
"The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now"PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands.
"This other worktree looks stale — I'll clean it too"Clean up only worktrees under .worktrees/ or worktrees/. Everything else belongs to the host.
"Removal refused — --force is just finishing the cleanup"The refusal means files exist only in that worktree. --force destroys them permanently. Show your human partner and ask.
"The merged-result failure is probably flaky"A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate.
"The base branch is obviously main"Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
"The push was rejected — force-push will fix it"A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request.
SKILL.md on GitHub

Sponsors

SnugThe clipboard manager you and your agent can use, safelyAgent CaffeineClose your lid, come back to finished workWaxBlock anything with supervision, without erasing your iPhoneOpen StepsSponsoredFree and open-source skills that make AI coding agents easier to understand, verify, and control.

Details

Repository
github.com/obra/superpowers
Category
Git & Pull Requests

More from obra/superpowers

All 14
  • Brainstorming407K
  • Systematic Debugging309.2K
  • Writing Plans285.1K
  • Using Superpowers272.2K
  • Requesting Code Review264K
  • Test Driven Development261.4K
  • Verification Before Completion254.2K
  • Executing Plans245.3K
  • Subagent Driven Development239.8K
  • Receiving Code Review223.3K
  • Dispatching Parallel Agents220.2K
  • Writing Skills219.9K
  • Using Git Worktrees219K

Recommended

More Git & Pull Requests
1juliusbrussee avatarcaveman-evidence-reviewjuliusbrussee/cavemanRead-only review of Caveman Cloud evidence: cost, Cave Score, workflows, traces, latency, errors, routing, savings. Use when asked what Caveman found or where L105.6Kinstalls
22dmurali avatarreview-loop2dmurali/review-loop-skillIterative worker-reviewer cycle that spawns a critic subagent to score work 1-10 and provide actionable feedback, then revises until a quality gate is met. Use 104.5Kinstalls
3heygen-com avatarchangelog-videoheygen-com/hyperframesTurn a weekly changelog .md into a finished branded changelog video (square 1080, ~45-60s, Annie VO, animated brand background, mock-UI visualizations, lowkey c59.9Kinstalls
4dietrichgebert avatarponytail-reviewdietrichgebert/ponytailCode review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead fl57.9Kinstalls
5DietrichGebert avatarponytail-reviewDietrichGebert/ponytailCode review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead fl57.9Kinstalls
6wshobson avatarcode-review-excellencewshobson/agentsMaster effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when 30.3Kinstalls