
Three Python scripts that handle different parts of the architecture workflow: one generates diagrams, one analyzes projects and suggests fixes, and one examines dependencies. Covers a wide tech stack from TypeScript and Go to React Native and Kubernetes. The reference docs on architecture patterns, system design workflows, and tech decisions seem like the real value here, assuming they're actually comprehensive. Marked as critical risk, which makes sense given it can modify project structure and dependencies. Best for when you're either starting greenfield work or need to audit an existing system's architecture and tooling choices.
$ npx -y skills add sickn33/antigravity-awesome-skills --skill senior-architect --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Review or plan system boundaries, dependencies and deployment design for a concrete user task. Gather requirements before recommending technology. This is a manual design workflow; the three bundled Python files are compatibility stubs, not automated analyzers.
architecture_diagram_generator.py, dependency_analyzer.py and project_architect.py share an intentionally incomplete CLI. They do not inspect code, generate diagrams, detect dependencies, benchmark, recommend fixes or modify projects. A zero-finding success would be misleading, so valid invocations report not_implemented and exit2. Invalid targets/paths exit1.
After reading the source, an explicitly requested stub invocation from the intended workspace is:
python /path/to/this/skill/scripts/project_architect.py . --json
The skill path is supplied by the actual installation, not the project's scripts directory. The optional --output creates a new JSON file inside the current workspace only and refuses existing files; it does not make the analysis complete. No requirements.txt, .env.example, package configuration, deploy manifests or automatic fixes are bundled. Do not run generic install/deploy commands based on this skill.
For a slow checkout task, inspect the actual request path and latency breakdown. Compare a query/index fix with a queue or service split. Choose the smallest justified option, list its failure behavior and propose an observable load test with a bounded data/cost budget. Do not claim measurements or production readiness without executed evidence.
Manual design guidance is not an executable architecture validator or security certification. The installed host does not gain deployment, messaging, credential or data-transfer authority from this document. No analysis or benchmark is represented by a stub result.
Sponsors