Turns messy situations into structured judgment briefs. You point it at a news event, decision, or conflict and it surfaces the hidden assumptions, real trade-offs, and who concretely pays. It skips the philosophical name-dropping and framework theater. Instead it asks who controls the frame, what motive is being disguised, and what would make the analysis wrong. The output is opinionated but honest: a bottom line, the fork you can't avoid choosing, what no one can say out loud, and three scenarios with observable signals. Good for when you need sharper thinking about something stuck or contested, not another summary.
npx skills add https://github.com/microchipgnu/philos --skill analysis