Skill Reviewer

This reviews skill PRs the same way you'd want your own code reviewed: structured findings with severity ratings (blocking, should-fix, nit), specific file and line references, and actionable fixes. It checks token budgets, routing conflicts, required sections like error handling and references, and repo conventions. The workflow is straightforward: collect changed files, run the checklist, classify issues, analyze trigger routing for conflicts, then draft a review with a summary table. It distinguishes between service skills in plugin/skills/ and meta-skills in .github/skills/, which have different requirements. If you maintain a skill repository and want consistent, thorough PR feedback without manually cross-checking conventions every time, this handles the tedious parts.