
Connects Claude to OpenReview's API v2 for querying machine learning conference submissions, reviews, and paper metadata. You get six tools: list and filter venue groups (conferences, workshops), pull full paper threads with all reviews and rebuttals by forum ID, search notes with full-text queries, and fetch individual notes or venue metadata. Runs through Pipeworx's gateway, which means you can use ask_pipeworx to query in plain English instead of calling tools directly. Useful when you're doing literature reviews, tracking submission trends across ML conferences, or need structured access to peer review discussions without scraping HTML.
OpenReview MCP — venue submissions + peer reviews for ML conferences (ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML, COLM, EMNLP, etc.). API v2.
Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1683+ live data sources.
list_venues(query?, limit?, offset?) — list active and historical venuesget_venue(group_id) — group / venue metadatalist_submissions(venue_id, query, limit?, offset?) — papers in a venue matching a topicget_note(id, details?) — individual note (paper, review, comment, decision)get_paper(forum_id) — paper + all its threads (reviews, rebuttal, decision)search_notes(query, content_field?, signature?, venue_id?, limit?, offset?) — full-text search, optionally scoped to one venue/notes read path is challengedVerified 2026-09-01. GET /notes?... on both api2.openreview.net and the v1
host answers 403 ChallengeRequiredError for every automated client — from
Cloudflare egress and from an ordinary laptop alike, with any User-Agent, and
with or without a token. /groups and /notes/search are unaffected.
What that means per tool:
| Tool | Path | Status |
|---|---|---|
list_venues, get_venue | /groups | works |
search_notes | /notes/search | works |
list_submissions | /notes/search (was /notes) | works with a query; a topic-less listing of a whole venue is no longer available to automated clients |
get_note, get_paper | /notes | blocked — returns upstream_down: naming the challenge. Read the paper at https://openreview.net/forum?id=<forum_id>, or find it via search_notes |
No API key clears the challenge, so a failure here is deliberately not reported as a credential problem.
Public reads are keyless. Some endpoints (private invitations, restricted venues) need a token — optional:
PLATFORM_OPENREVIEW_TOKEN?_apiKey=<token> after logging in at openreview.net and grabbing a tokenhttps://api2.openreview.net/ — v2 (also https://api.openreview.net/ v1 for legacy venues).
Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):
{
"mcpServers": {
"openreview": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/openreview/mcp"
}
}
}
tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/openreview/mcp returns the tools in the table
above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx,
discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the
gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a
single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the
pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and
is the authoritative answer for a given day.
This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a
scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via
ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a
second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without
them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth,
connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.
Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pipeworx": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
}
}
}
Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1683+ data sources. The
only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx
reaches all of them from either one.
curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/list_venues \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"query":"ICLR"}'
No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/list_venues. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.
This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:
{
"mcpServers": {
"openreview": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-openreview"]
}
}
}
Or run it directly to confirm it starts:
npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-openreview
It speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call
for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway
connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.
Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:
ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Openreview data" })
The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.
MIT